By coincidence, if you tried applying for India’s e‑visa today you’ll quickly notice Bangladesh isn’t on the eligible list, and that omission reflects deliberate policy choices tied to security, migration and bilateral history. You should expect to use stamped visas through Indian missions, face longer processing and stricter documentation, and weigh practical travel steps against political sensitivities — keep going to understand the specific reasons, alternatives, and signals that could change this stance.
This guide is for two distinct audiences: travelers from Bangladesh seeking practical, step-by-step instructions to obtain an India e‑Visa, and policy readers—such as immigration officials, legal advisers, or researchers—who need concise summaries of eligibility criteria, regulatory changes, and source citations. If you’re a traveler, you’ll get clear instructions tailored to common travel preferences, required documents, application timelines, and alternatives when e‑Visa access is restricted. If you’re a policy reader, you’ll find distilled evidence on the legal basis for visa policy, recent regulatory changes, cross-border security considerations, and citations to official notifications or gazettes. You’ll be able to compare administrative practice against published rules, assess policy implications, and identify data gaps. The tone is factual and directive: follow documented procedures, note deadlines, and consult primary sources cited. This structure helps you act—whether planning a trip or evaluating governance—without wading through extraneous commentary.
Can Bangladeshi passport holders obtain an India e‑Visa in 2026? No — as of 2026 Bangladeshis remain ineligible for India’s e‑visa scheme under current policy and travel restrictions. You should plan for alternative visa routes and expect standard embassy processing rather than online clearance.
Eligibility: Bangladesh not listed among e‑visa nationalities.
Application path: Consular visa via Indian missions required.
Processing: Embassies follow document checks, biometrics, and longer visa processing times.
Travel restrictions: Policy choices reflect bilateral security and migration considerations.
Evidence: Official Indian government notifications and embassy advisories confirm status.
You shouldn’t rely on third‑party claims of e‑visa access. Check the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs or nearest Indian consulate for documented updates. If policy changes, official portals and embassy notices will state new eligibility, exact requirements, and any interim procedures for applicants.
Because eligibility determines your entry route, India’s e‑Visa program streamlines short-term travel for qualifying nationals by letting you apply online, pay fees electronically, and receive electronic authorization linked to your passport—eliminating a consular appointment for eligible categories such as tourism, business, medical, and emergency visits. You check e visa eligibility against nationality lists, passport validity, and purpose of visit; meeting criteria lets you proceed to the application process. The online form requires biographic data, travel dates, passport details, and a recent photo; supporting documents vary by category (e.g., medical referrals for treatment visas). After submission and fee payment, authorities issue an electronic travel authorization (ETA) or reject with reasons; processing times are published and subject to verification. On arrival, immigration verifies your passport and ETA; you must present return/onward tickets and comply with permitted stay limits. The system is policy-driven, data‑validated, and intended to reduce administrative burden while maintaining border security.
If you don’t qualify for India’s e‑Visa, you’ll need to pursue alternative visa routes—primarily the stamped (regular) visa issued by Indian diplomatic missions, the protected-area/inner-line permits for restricted regions, or long‑term visas like employment, student, or OCI pathways—each with distinct eligibility, document requirements, and processing timelines. You’ll apply at the Indian High Commission/Consulate with required forms, biometric appointments, invitation letters, proof of funds, and police clearances as applicable. Be aware of travel restrictions to specific border or sensitive areas; protected-area permits (PAP) and Inner Line Permits (ILP) have separate procedures and approvals.
Stamped tourist/business/work/student visas via consulate processing
Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) eligibility and documentation
Employment/project visas requiring employer sponsorship and visas
PAP/ILP applications for restricted states and associated limits
Transit and medical visas where exceptions apply
Assess processing times, required evidence, and legal grounds; consult the consulate site or an immigration lawyer for case‑specific guidance on visa alternatives and travel restrictions.
To understand current e‑visa rules, you should view them against a long history of India–Bangladesh relations shaped by partition, the 1971 war, and subsequent bilateral agreements. Migration patterns and border management challenges have repeatedly influenced visa frameworks and operational practices at land crossings. Recent security concerns and policy shifts — including measures on illegal migration and counterterrorism — have produced tighter controls and periodic adjustments to visa categories and processing.
Though separated by partition and conflict, India and Bangladesh have maintained a complex relationship shaped by shared history, cross-border migration, and evolving security and trade priorities. You’ll see how diplomatic history has set patterns for contemporary visa negotiations and policy choices. Key treaties, relief cooperation, and periodic tensions have influenced mutual trust and procedural reciprocity.
1971 war legacy informs mutual recognition and early cooperation
1974 and 1996 agreements shaped formal diplomatic channels
Economic integration pushed pragmatic visa policy adjustments
Security incidents tightened administrative controls and review mechanisms
Periodic bilateral commissions reviewed travel, trade, and consular protocols
You’ll interpret current e-visa absence as a product of layered agreements, shifting priorities, and trust deficits evident in documented diplomatic exchanges.
Because migration has long been both a social reality and a policy flashpoint, border issues have played a decisive role in shaping India–Bangladesh visa practices and administrative controls. You need to see how migration trends — seasonal labor, family reunification, and irregular crossings — have driven procedural caution and selective mobility measures. Data-driven deterrents, biometric checks, and local cooperation aim to balance humanitarian need and state control without addressing later security policy shifts.
| Issue | Implication |
|—|—|
| Seasonal migration | Temporary permits, monitoring |
| Irregular crossings | Increased patrols, coordination |
You’ll note that investments in border security and joint management have reduced incidents but sustained constraints on easy e-visa access for Bangladeshi passport holders, reflecting administrative risk calculations.
When you trace the arc of India–Bangladesh relations, security concerns and policy shifts emerge as key drivers reshaping visa rules and enforcement: cross-border militancy, illegal migration, and smuggling prompted tightened controls, biometric screening, and phased restrictions on e-visa access for Bangladeshi nationals. You need to see how these security concerns translated into concrete policy implications: enhanced vetting, data-sharing with regional partners, and conditional restoration pathways tied to compliance metrics. Evidence shows targeted suspensions followed incidents rather than blanket bans, aiming to balance bilateral ties and domestic security.
Biometric enrollment expanded at entry points
Intelligence-led watchlists influenced e-visa eligibility
Temporary suspensions used after specific incidents
Data-sharing agreements increased scrutiny
Conditional, phased reopening linked to compliance metrics
You should consider how historical border tensions—including past clashes and unresolved boundary issues—shape India’s cautious visa stance toward Bangladesh. Security concerns, such as cross-border crime and migration control, are cited in official policy justifications for limiting e‑visa eligibility. Reciprocity in diplomatic relations and matching visa regimes also influences India’s selective access decisions.
Although relations have improved in recent years, historical border tensions between India and Bangladesh continue to shape visa policy, with periodic incidents—such as cross-border skirmishes, unresolved enclaves, and smuggling routes—prompting New Delhi to restrict electronic visa access as a risk-mitigation measure. You should understand that long-standing border disputes and the legacy of historical agreements (like the 1974 and 2015 accords) influence administrative choices. Policy-makers link porous borders to irregular movement, complicating biometric and online vetting. Evidence from patrol reports and bilateral talks shows occasional flare-ups that raise operational risks for e-visa systems. You’ll see this context reflected in stricter entry channels and targeted screening priorities.
Border disputes increase verification burdens
Enclave legacies complicate jurisdiction
Smuggling routes enable illicit transit
Patrol incidents trigger policy reviews
Historical agreements guide bilateral responses
Building on how border incidents and enclave issues raise operational burdens, security concerns and diplomatic reciprocity are central reasons India limits e‑visa access for Bangladeshi passport holders. You need to understand that authorities assess risks from illegal migration, trafficking, and cross‑border crime; e‑visa systems reduce vetting time and can increase exploitability. Evidence from internal security reviews and public statements links e‑visa restrictions to these concerns. Reciprocity issues matter diplomatically: India expects comparable consular access and travel facilitation for its citizens, and perceived asymmetry influences visa policy choices. In practice, restricting e‑visas maintains tighter screening, allows case‑by‑case consular checks, and preserves leverage in bilateral negotiations. These measures reflect a policy trade‑off between facilitation and national security imperatives.
When evaluating the discontinuation of e‑visa privileges, Indian authorities cite concrete security and migration risks linked to recent travel patterns and document irregularities; you should understand how those rationales connect to broader security concerns and migration policies. Indian statements and internal assessments point to measurable spikes in overstays, use of altered travel documents, and routes exploited for unintended work migration. You’ll see policy measures framed as risk mitigation rather than punitive acts.
Indian authorities frame e‑visa suspensions as proportionate, risk‑based measures addressing overstays, document fraud, and misuse of transit routes
Increased incidence of overstays and irregular employment
Detection of forged or tampered travel documents at entry points
Patterns of repeated short-term entries inconsistent with visa intent
Use of transit corridors facilitating unauthorized onward movement
Intelligence reports linking certain travel flows to organized facilitators
Given the evidence cited, Indian authorities argue that suspension of e‑visa access is a proportionate response to reduce exploitation, protect labour markets, and uphold border integrity while migration policies are recalibrated and bilateral cooperation is strengthened.
Those security and migration concerns directly heighten the importance of reliable identity checks for cross-border digital visas: biometric verification, document authentication, and real-time watchlist screening must be robust enough to detect altered documents, repeat entries under different identities, and facilitators’ use of transit routes. You need identity verification systems that combine multi-modal biometrics (fingerprint, facial, liveness) with cryptographic document validation and interoperable databases. Evidence shows single-factor checks are circumvented; layered verification reduces false negatives and fraud. You should demand clear data‑sharing agreements, defined retention limits, and audit logs to preserve legal compliance and digital security. Operational constraints — inconsistent enrolment quality, connectivity gaps at remote ports, and differing data standards — must be addressed through capacity building and standardized APIs. Policy design should mandate redress mechanisms for misidentification, independent oversight, and performance metrics (accuracy, false-match rates, processing time). That approach balances facilitation of legitimate travel with mitigation of security risks.
Because human trafficking and smuggling exploit vulnerabilities in migration systems, policymakers must treat these threats as central to e‑visa design and implementation. You need to understand that relaxing entry processes without targeted safeguards can widen exploitation opportunities along smuggling routes and increase risks for vulnerable populations. Evidence from regional enforcement and NGO reports shows correlation between simplified visa channels and adaptive criminal networks.
Strengthen vetting to disrupt documented smuggling routes.
Integrate intelligence-sharing with Bangladesh to trace trafficking flows.
Require data-driven risk assessments before expanding e‑visa access.
Mandate biometric verification and real-time flagging for high-risk profiles.
Fund victim-protection and repatriation protocols tied to visa policy.
You’ll want policies that balance mobility and protection: conditional e‑visa pilots, predefined suspension triggers tied to trafficking indicators, and measurable evaluation metrics. This keeps humanitarian obligations visible while preventing e‑visa mechanisms from becoming conduits for human trafficking.
You’ll need to assess gaps in border infrastructure that could impede secure e-visa processing and passenger flow at key crossings. Evaluate the extent to which national digital ID systems are integrated with immigration databases to support real-time verification. Also quantify biometric enrollment capacity and backlog to determine whether current operations can meet increased cross-border verification demands.
While Bangladesh has made progress modernizing border processes, significant administrative and technical gaps remain that affect implementation of an India e‑visa regime for Bangladeshi nationals. You’ll face constraints in border security coordination and uneven infrastructure development at key land crossings and ports of entry, which impede reliable e‑visa verification and traveler processing. Limited trained personnel, legacy hardware, and siloed data flows increase delay and risk. Upgrading checkpoints requires clear procurement, maintenance plans, and interagency SOPs aligned with India’s e‑visa protocols.
Inconsistent network connectivity at remote crossings
Outdated inspection and biometric equipment
Shortage of trained immigration and IT staff
Fragmented command-and-control and data-sharing policies
Funding gaps for prioritized infrastructure development
Gaps in border infrastructure directly affect how Bangladesh can link national digital ID systems to an India e‑visa workflow, since reliable connectivity and interoperable hardware are prerequisites for real‑time identity verification. You need coordinated policy and technical standards to address digital identity challenges: common APIs, data schemas, and authentication protocols that align with India’s e‑visa requirements. Administratively, clear legal frameworks for cross‑border data sharing and defined responsibilities reduce transaction friction. Technically, redundancy, secure network links, and device certification lower failure rates at ports of entry. You must also prioritize biometric data security through encryption, access controls, and audit trails to meet bilateral trust thresholds. Short‑term pilots, measurable KPIs, and donor‑backed capacity building will show readiness before full integration.
Because robust biometric enrollment underpins trusted e‑visa issuance, Bangladesh must rapidly scale both administrative systems and technical capacity to meet India’s verification standards. You’ll need clear governance, trained operators, and interoperable systems to capture high-quality biometric data and address enrollment challenges that currently block cross-border trust.
Standardize enrollment protocols nationwide to guarantee consistency.
Invest in certified scanners and secure transmission links for data integrity.
Train and certify personnel to reduce capture errors and fraud risk.
Strengthen oversight, audit trails, and data protection for compliance.
Pilot interoperable exchanges with India to validate technical readiness.
This approach relies on evidence from recent pilots showing error-rate reductions after equipment upgrades and targeted training, making the case for prioritized, measurable reforms.
A country’s visa system is only as effective as its processing capacity and the rules that govern it, and for Bangladeshi applicants to India that capacity shows clear limits: appointment backlogs, constrained staffing at consulates, and rigid documentary requirements systematically extend wait times beyond published targets. You’ll find that limited visa processing slots and centralized decision-making produce predictable bottlenecks: files queue for supervisory review, biometric enrollments are batched, and missing documents trigger full application rejections rather than partial holds. Empirical reports and consular notices indicate turnaround variance far above nominal timelines, reflecting both resource shortfalls and procedural rigidity. From a policy perspective, alleviation options are clear: decentralize routine clearances, increase trained adjudicator headcount, and introduce proportional remedies for minor documentation errors. Until operational reforms address these bureaucratic challenges and align capacity with demand, you should expect persistent delays and uneven access for Bangladeshi travelers seeking Indian visas.
You should note recent high-level bilateral frameworks that set the agenda for e‑visa facilitation and wider cooperation, as they influence procedural changes. Pay attention to security and migration agreements that have introduced data‑sharing protocols and joint verification mechanisms affecting eligibility and screening timelines. These policy shifts are documented in joint communiqués and technical annexes that you can reference to assess operational impact.
While formal diplomatic channels have steadily expanded, recent high-level talks between India and Bangladesh have produced several concrete frameworks—covering border management, water sharing, energy cooperation, and streamlined e-visa processes—that directly affect Bangladeshi passport holders and cross-border mobility. You’ll see these frameworks reflect intensified bilateral cooperation and disciplined diplomatic negotiations, translating political will into procedural instruments. They set timelines, data-sharing protocols, and pilot projects that shape future e-visa feasibility, without promising immediate rollout. Evidence comes from joint statements, memoranda of understanding, and working-group reports. Pay attention to implementation metrics and transparency clauses; they determine whether frameworks move from paper to practice. Key components include:
Clear institutional roles and timelines
Data-sharing and privacy safeguards
Technical pilot for e-visa trials
Energy and transport connectivity clauses
Dispute-resolution mechanisms
Because recent talks have tied security cooperation to migration management, you should focus on agreements that concretely affect cross-border movement, law enforcement coordination, and asylum procedures. You’ll note recent bilateral communiqués prioritize information-sharing to address security concerns tied to transnational crime and undocumented crossings. Practical outcomes include joint border-monitoring protocols, expedited verification channels for visa denials, and memoranda on repatriation timelines that influence migration policies. Evidence from 2024–2026 meetings shows operational task forces and shared digital platforms for biometrics, which reduce irregular entry but raise procedural safeguards questions for asylum seekers. For you, the takeaway is clear: these accords shape eligibility, processing speed, and enforcement posture—factors directly relevant to why an e-visa option remains constrained for Bangladeshi passport holders.
Although India’s e‑Visa expansion strategy aims to streamline travel facilitation, adding Bangladesh faces concrete legal and regulatory hurdles you need to account for: differing immigration statutes, reciprocity obligations under the Passports Act and visa policy norms, data‑protection and cross‑border information‑sharing constraints under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, and sectoral security clearances required by the Ministry of Home Affairs and intelligence agencies. You’ll need to reconcile statutory visa categories with automated online processes, and assess policy implications for bilateral reciprocity and domestic legal compliance around evidence retention, auditability, and appeals.
Adding Bangladesh to India’s e‑Visa requires legal harmonisation, reciprocity, data‑protection safeguards, and multi‑agency security clearances.
Harmonising visa application workflows with existing immigration laws
Meeting reciprocity requirements and diplomatic assurances
Ensuring lawful cross‑border data transfers and user consent
Securing sectoral clearance (MHA, IB, coastal and border agencies)
Updating regulations for fraud prevention, biometric use, and audits
Each barrier is legal and administrative; you’ll need inter‑ministerial coordination, statutory amendments or policy notifications, and documented safeguards before e‑Visa inclusion is viable.
If you’re a Bangladeshi passport holder planning travel to India in 2026, this step‑by‑step guide walks you through the current visa options, online application process, documentation standards, fees, biometric/verification requirements, and typical processing timelines so you can prepare an evidence‑based, compliant submission. You’ll select the correct visa category, complete the online form on the Indian visa portal, upload certified documents, schedule an appointment at the consulate/VFS, provide biometrics, and attend any interview. Follow visa application tips: double‑check names, verify passport validity, and keep originals at appointment. Prioritize travel document preparation: recent photos, invitation/itinerary, and proof of funds. Retain copies of receipts and reference numbers.
| Step | Action | Key evidence |
|——|——–|————–|
| 1 | Choose visa type | Purpose documentation |
| 2 | Fill online form | Accurate personal data |
| 3 | Upload docs | Scanned originals |
| 4 | Book appointment | Payment receipt |
| 5 | Biometrics/interview | Passport originals
Now that you’ve prepared your application, you’ll need to understand typical processing timelines, fee structures, and the required documents so you can schedule travel and budget correctly. India does not offer an e‑visa to Bangladeshi passport holders in 2026; instead you’ll follow consular procedures. Processing times at missions typically run 7–21 working days depending on workload and completeness of required documents. Fees vary by visa type and reciprocity policy; check the mission’s fee schedule before payment.
Confirm processing times with the specific Indian mission handling your application.
Verify fee amounts and accepted payment methods on the mission’s official site.
Prepare required documents: valid passport, recent photo, completed application form, invitation/itinerary if applicable, and proof of funds or residence.
Submit originals where consular rules demand and retain copies for your records.
Expect additional time for administrative checks or background verification.
Follow official consular guidance; evidence-based timelines and document lists reduce delays.
While entry to India for Bangladeshi passport holders is governed by consular visa approvals rather than e‑visas, you’ll need to follow specific restrictions on permitted stay lengths, purpose of visit, and designated ports of entry as set by the issuing mission and Indian immigration authorities. You must comply with the visa endorsement: duration (single- or multiple-entry), maximum continuous stay, and any purpose limitations (tourism, business, medical, study). Entry procedures require presenting the physical visa vignette or stamped passport, return/onward ticket, and supporting documents cited in the consular approval. Travel limitations may include restricted entry for certain activities, prohibited employment, and region-specific permits (border or protected areas). Use only the checkpoints listed on your visa or in official guidance—major international airports and specified land border crossings—otherwise you risk denial of entry. Check the issuing mission’s specific instructions and Indian Bureau of Immigration notices before travel to confirm permitted stays, valid checkpoints, and any interim procedural updates.
To reduce processing delays and rejection risk, make sure you submit a complete, accurate document set—passport, photo, and supporting papers must meet prescribed specifications. Apply well before your intended travel date so authorities have time for verification and any requests for clarification. Following official checklist items and avoiding last‑minute edits materially lowers the chance of refusal.
Because incomplete or inconsistent paperwork is the most common cause of visa delays and rejections, you should assemble and verify every required document before you submit your application. Follow an evidence-based document checklist aligned with official application requirements: mismatched names, expired passports, or missing photos are frequent, avoidable causes of refusal. Verify originals against scanned copies, guarantee photo and file-size specs are met, and confirm sponsoring or invitation letters match travel dates.
Passport copy: biographic page, valid minimum six months
Recent passport photo: size, background, format per specs
Proof of residence and relationship (if applicable)
Invitation/sponsorship letter and travel itinerary matching dates
Payment proof and printed application confirmation
Keeping files organized reduces errors and supports transparent review.
If you start your e‑visa application well before your intended travel date, you’ll reduce the risk of processing delays or last‑minute rejections; Indian e‑visa systems and consulates report higher error rates and request more supporting documents when applicants submit under tight time pressure. You should schedule your Visa Application early, verify document formats, and allow time for consular queries. Keep copies and evidence of Travel Preparation: bookings, accommodation, and invitation letters. Respond promptly to any official requests.
| Action | Timing | Evidence needed |
|—|—:|—|
| Submit e‑visa | 4–8 weeks prior | Passport scan, photo |
| Verify data | Immediately after submission | Reservation confirmations |
| Respond to queries | Within 48 hours | Additional documents, receipts |
This reduces administrative risk and aligns with published processing guidelines.
While streamlining access for Bangladeshi passport holders will require coordinated changes across IT, immigration, and consular operations, the rollout should follow a phased, measurable plan that minimizes disruption and preserves security. You’d start by evaluating Digital Infrastructure capacity—bandwidth, authentication, and data protection—and map integrations with immigration and law-enforcement databases. Policy Implementation should sequence legal, operational, and diplomatic approvals, with clear KPIs for processing times and fraud metrics. Pilot testing at select ports and a limited applicant cohort will let you validate tech and procedures before scale. Training for visa officers and frontline staff must be mandated alongside contingency plans for system outages. Public guidance and transparent timelines reduce uncertainty for applicants.
Streamline access through phased pilots, secure infrastructure audits, staff training, clear KPIs, and transparent public guidance
Conduct capacity and security audits before launch
Draft phased Policy Implementation timelines with KPIs
Run controlled pilots at selected entry points
Train staff and publish applicant-facing procedures
Monitor metrics and iterate based on pilot evidence
After pilots and metrics are in place, you’ll want to monitor specific policy, operational, and diplomatic indicators that signal a move to broader e‑visa access for Bangladeshi passport holders. Track official announcements on E visa developments from Indian ministries and visa portals; these reveal timing and scope. Assess Policy implications in parliamentary debates, regulatory drafts, and published impact assessments. Watch Regional cooperation initiatives—cross-border transport agreements or joint tourism promotions—that make e‑visa logic stronger. Note Technological advancements such as biometric integration, API upgrades, and fraud-detection tools that lower barriers. Scrutinize Security assessments: publicized threat analyses or border-management reports that justify or delay liberalization. Monitor Administrative challenges—processing backlogs, staffing changes, or training programs—that affect rollout feasibility. Gauge Public opinion via media trends and stakeholder statements from travel industry groups. Finally, follow Diplomatic negotiations between India and Bangladesh at ministerial and working-group levels; progress there is often the decisive signal that e‑visa expansion is imminent.
Wondering how to get ready if India opens e‑visa access for Bangladeshi passport holders? You’ll want a concise checklist that focuses on compliance and risk mitigation. Understand E visa implications on duration, permitted activities, and entry points; prepare Travel documentations that meet biometric, validity, and photo standards. Confirm visa fee policies and payment methods to avoid delays.
Check passport validity (minimum six months) and blank pages required.
Prepare digital-quality photos and scanned biodata page for the online form.
Review permitted visa categories and maximum stay to align trip purpose.
Verify entry/exit airports and any e‑gate or biometrics requirements.
Keep proof of onward travel, accommodation bookings, and financial means.
Monitor official announcements and trusted consular guidance. If access opens, act promptly: incomplete Travel documentations or misreading E visa implications will cause refusals or fines. Make sure you use only government portals and retain printed and digital copies of approvals.
Yes, you can’t use e‑visas; diplomats use diplomatic/official visas under diplomatic privileges and travel regulations. You’ll need mission support and embassy coordination, following India’s protocol, proof of official purpose, and consular processing.
Absolutely—yes, but it’s nuanced: minor eligibility depends on your child’s citizenship and documentation, and visa regulations require proof of Indian nationality or eligible passport; follow official consular guidance and submit birth and identity evidence.
No — you’re generally ineligible: Rohingya residency issues and E visa eligibility criteria require clear citizenship, secure documentation, and consular approval, so refugees holding Bangladeshi residency usually can’t meet India’s e‑visa standards.
Yes — you’re not magically exempt: many countries allow electronic authorizations for transit passengers, but you’ll still meet specific transit requirements and document checks; confirm airline and destination rules, apply online, and expect biometric or visa-waiver exceptions.
Yes — you’ll face different rules: dual nationality implications mean your e visa eligibility hinges on the passport you present; Indian policy assesses the Bangladeshi passport independently, so use the non‑Bangladeshi passport if eligible.
